This
article, published by the Guardian and written by David Batty, sheds light on
the quandary imposed on individual’s accents in correlation to their
intellectual ability. This article
particularly highlights the controversy through a study conducted that conveyed
the stereotypes inflicted towards those with Brummie accents. The testing unleashed
three UK accents to 48 participants and asked them to rate their intelligence
on a mark scheme from 1-10. The conclusion deduced portrayed that the Yorkshire
accent sounded most scintillating, as oppose to the Birmingham accent that was
degraded and marked as less intelligent than individuals that didn’t speak at
all. Regional stereotypes were imposed on Brummies as “...a lot of people
associate Birmingham with criminal activity, and they associate criminal
activity with low intelligence.” This assumption of criminal
activity is a stereotype in which dispersed.
This concept has a direct correspondence to the stereotypes discussed previously in Amy Tan’s story. Tan’s mother was perceived as less witty, due to the fact that she spoke “broken English,” and was incompetent of speaking it with a high degree of accuracy. However this by no means should be a denotation of one’s intelligence or self-worth.
This concept has a direct correspondence to the stereotypes discussed previously in Amy Tan’s story. Tan’s mother was perceived as less witty, due to the fact that she spoke “broken English,” and was incompetent of speaking it with a high degree of accuracy. However this by no means should be a denotation of one’s intelligence or self-worth.
No comments:
Post a Comment